i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
propensity within someone
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
division of reality is straying away from it
lol yea
fw
all that is to say
idk
...
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
barren land
magnetisation/form
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
...
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
what do you mean
its good
its good short few pages
so an active mazelike process
i dont understand magnetisation
whats your name?
the site i am dreaming