a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
so the method has to be autonomous
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
propensity within someone
its good
we can only engage in such a way
division of reality is straying away from it
magnetisation/form
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
thank you
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
lol yea
i really havent
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
its good
all that is to say
whats your name?
...
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
autonomy of learning
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
lol
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
but i respect your search
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.