yes
its good
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
autonomy of learning
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
send link
hello reader,
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
sorry i am texting like a slav
fw
isaac newton
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
division of reality is straying away from it
isaac
your feed looks like my tumblr
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
have you read
no i haven't really read anything
not so on: yvf(wthw)