there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i want to do that too

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so the method has to be autonomous

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

what do you mean

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

isaac newton

Rain, starting

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i dont understand magnetisation

we can only engage in such a way

currently

so an active mazelike process

sorry i am texting like a slav

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

like magnets

not so on: yvf(wthw)

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

isaac