ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i was tempted to lie about my name

and the fake qualifier

so an active mazelike process

all that is to say

your feed looks like my tumblr

isaac

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

its good

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so the method has to be autonomous

i want to do that too

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

we can only engage in such a way

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

was it worth it

ion

god being the centre magnet