there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

division of reality is straying away from it

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

your feed looks like my tumblr

magnetisation/form

that looks like my instagram account

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so the method has to be autonomous

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

fw

idk

2 (actually index). two is company

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

is everyoneback on tumblr now

and the fake qualifier

lol

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

December 2025

I Write Goodbye Letter

autonomy of learning

...

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

part of an old note. It will get lighter.
confused - is it the tide or its absense? I still like where I was going with it. anyway, real reader know this site is the note.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

Thank you, Jack

or never left

so at the end

not so on: yvf(wthw)

send your tumblr