in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
as in
not their contents
so the method has to be autonomous
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
ahnaf abrar
i was tempted to lie about my name
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
ion
feel you
division of reality is straying away from it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
its performative
sorry i am texting like a slav
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
plato
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
god being the centre magnet
i really havent
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
and the fake qualifier
yeah
...
so at the end