feel you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

propensity within someone

so the method has to be autonomous

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

you cannot feed someone truth

i dont understand magnetisation

what do you mean

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

was it worth it

its good

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

ion

autonomy of learning

we can only engage in such a way

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i really havent

plato

was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.

a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.

I created this site