mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

it is hopeful

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

so an active mazelike process

abrar?

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

i want to do that too

feel you

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

much more tactility

its good

i have read not even 1 book

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we need to be deconstructing our identities

...

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

yeah

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

ion

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

not so on: yvf(wthw)

so at the end

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.