mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

like magnets

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

we can only engage in such a way

its good

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

lol

or never left

i understand

plato

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

all that is to say

magnetises a pin

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its good short few pages

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

have you read

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

no i haven't really read anything

barren land

autonomy of learning

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i have read not even 1 book

isaac newton

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

IWGD

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

was it worth it