all that is to say

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not their contents

you cannot feed someone truth

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

much more tactility

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

Worse Lift

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

i have read not even 1 book

and the fake qualifier

I am below everything.

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

...

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging

i understand

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

what do you think my name is

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine