I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

abrar?

all that is to say

no i haven't really read anything

and the fake qualifier

yeah

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

we need to be deconstructing our identities

have you read

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i really havent

much more tactility

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we can only engage in such a way

isaac newton

was it worth it

isaac

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class