there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

whats your name?

we can only engage in such a way

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

plato

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like first name

propensity within someone

feel you

you have a beautiful account btw

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

ahnaf abrar

1

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

13, H, grate

all that is to say

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

i really havent

Rain, starting

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

hiding from the rain