i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i love it here

abrar?

as in

yeah

lol

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

isaac newton

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

feel you

i was tempted to lie about my name

we need to be deconstructing our identities

and the fake qualifier

what do you think my name is

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i want to do that too

much more tactility

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no i haven't really read anything

which magnetises chains of pins

its good short few pages

like magnets

2 (actually index). two is company

Slug

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

...

i really havent

bro i read nothing in my life

not so on: yvf(wthw)

was it worth it

I Write Goodbye Letter

so at the end

we can only engage in such a way