there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

autonomy of learning

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

its good

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so the method has to be autonomous

magnetisation/form

is this you as well

isaac

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

have you read

propensity within someone

its good short few pages

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

ion

plato

bro i read nothing in my life

I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.

feel you

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them


i really havent




division of reality is straying away from it

yeah