i love it here

not their contents

autonomy of learning

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we need to be deconstructing our identities

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i really havent

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i want to do that too

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

as in

was it worth it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:38:15

i was tempted to lie about my name

abrar?

you cannot feed someone truth

so at the end

ahnaf abrar

much more tactility

is this you as well

...