ahnaf abrar

much more tactility

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

we can only engage in such a way

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

barren land

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

idk

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

its good

so an active mazelike process

lol

plato

which magnetises chains of pins

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i dont understand magnetisation

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

feel you

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

what do you think my name is

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

and the fake qualifier

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

its good