my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

abrar?

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

its good

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

no like which do people call me

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

that looks like my instagram account

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

and the fake qualifier

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

autonomy of learning

I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

so an active mazelike process

i really havent

much more tactility

like first name

Picture

There is a pause. She ashes her cigarette. It falls on me. It seems like the birds have stopped too.

or never left

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book