the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
plato
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
abrar?
and the fake qualifier
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
its good short few pages
i really havent
that looks like my instagram account
its good
yeah
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
bro i read nothing in my life
or never left
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
much more tactility
its good
what do you mean
propensity within someone
division of reality is straying away from it
i have read not even 1 book
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
sorry i am texting like a slav
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
i understand
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
like magnets
magnetises a pin
we can only engage in such a way
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
autonomy of learning
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine