Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
sorry i am texting like a slav
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
isaac
autonomy of learning
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i love it here
i was tempted to lie about my name
as in
whats your name?
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i dont understand magnetisation
lol
and the fake qualifier
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
bro i read nothing in my life
no i haven't really read anything
so the method has to be autonomous
its performative
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
no like which do people call me