there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

abrar?

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

fw

is this you as well

i love it here

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

like first name

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

i understand

what do you think my name is

so at the end

autonomy of learning

so an active mazelike process

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

isaac newton

its good

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

Slug

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

not so on: yvf(wthw)

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

like magnets

...

or never left

yeah

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

is everyoneback on tumblr now

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

ion

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given