lol yea

and the fake qualifier

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

as in

so the method has to be autonomous

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

its performative

is everyoneback on tumblr now

have you read

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

plato

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i love it here

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

idk

so at the end

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

abrar?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ion

i really havent

i understand

lol

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

god being the centre magnet

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

thank you

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

you cannot feed someone truth