okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.

feel you

i was tempted to lie about my name

yeah

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

as in

what do you mean

not their contents

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetisation/form

that looks like my instagram account

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

and the fake qualifier

so the method has to be autonomous

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

plato

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

its performative

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

ion

you cannot feed someone truth

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

much more tactility

thank you

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

was it worth it

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i really havent

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i understand

i love it here

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine