like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
sorry i am texting like a slav
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
autonomy of learning
its good
like first name
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
yeah
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
thank you
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
no i haven't really read anything
its performative
division of reality is straying away from it
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so an active mazelike process
whats your name?
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people