i really havent
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i want to do that too
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
idk
i love it here
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
you cannot feed someone truth
plato
much more tactility
as in
Lift Analysis
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.