i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
really i want the internet
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
its performative
so an active mazelike process
or never left
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
its good
your feed looks like my tumblr
barren land
like first name
was it worth it
ion
kind of mythopoesis
magnetisation/form
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i see a website
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
December 2025