as in

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

all that is to say

propensity within someone

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

its good

autonomy of learning

thank you

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

which magnetises chains of pins

sorry i am texting like a slav

whats your name?

like magnets

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

division of reality is straying away from it

ion

have you read

we can only engage in such a way

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its performative

send your tumblr

or never left

not so on: yvf(wthw)

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever

and the fake qualifier