like magnets
all that is to say
lol
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
yeah
like first name
not their contents
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
no like which do people call me
its performative
autonomy of learning
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
fw
ion
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
we need to be deconstructing our identities
so at the end
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
its good short few pages
i dont understand magnetisation
is this you as well
what do you mean
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i understand
yeah
i was tempted to lie about my name
plato
i love it here
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
Thank you, Jack