so at the end
so an active mazelike process
not their contents
like first name
we need to be deconstructing our identities
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
have you read
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
what do you think my name is
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl
its good
whats your name?
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
ion
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
feel you
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
plato