in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i dont understand magnetisation
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
autonomy of learning
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
much more tactility
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
feel you
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i love it here
what do you think my name is
and the fake qualifier
i want to do that too
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
plato
ahnaf abrar
bro i read nothing in my life
its performative
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
the site i am dreaming
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf