no like which do people call me

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

feel you

ahnaf abrar

propensity within someone

autonomy of learning

god being the centre magnet

lol

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

magnetisation/form

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

abrar?

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

what do you mean

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

we can only engage in such a way

i dont understand magnetisation

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

not their contents

so an active mazelike process

...

plato

no longer writing in the third person

send your tumblr

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

but really the thing should be autonomous