i love it here
yeah
or never left
so an active mazelike process
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
not their contents
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
your feed looks like my tumblr
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
barren land
autonomy of learning
division of reality is straying away from it
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
have you read
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting
no like which do people call me
its good
which magnetises chains of pins