but really the thing should be autonomous

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone truth

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

autonomy of learning

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

or never left

lol

lol yea

so an active mazelike process

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

December 2025

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me