i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
so the method has to be autonomous
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
not their contents
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
division of reality is straying away from it
magnetisation/form
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
and the fake qualifier
like first name
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
bro i read nothing in my life
...
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
send link
lol
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
yeah
we can only engage in such a way
hello reader,
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
fw