i dont understand magnetisation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

which magnetises chains of pins

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

your feed looks like my tumblr

its good

autonomy of learning

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so at the end

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

as in

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

and the fake qualifier

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

send your tumblr

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

yeah

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

Windrush Art Kid Oligarch

not their contents

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.


we can only engage in such a way

idk