my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
lol yea
which magnetises chains of pins
have you read
and the fake qualifier
not their contents
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
like first name
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
whats your name?
all that is to say
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
was it worth it
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting