you have a beautiful account btw

i understand

all that is to say

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

yeah

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

idk

its performative

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

isaac newton

not their contents

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

we need to be deconstructing our identities

ion

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

so an active mazelike process

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

like magnets

god being the centre magnet

as in

i want to do that too

and the fake qualifier

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i really havent

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

you cannot feed someone truth

magnetises a pin

we want to live the knowledge too live the content