was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

idk

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

magnetisation/form

lol yea

so at the end

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

autonomy of learning

or never left

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

isaac

isaac newton

what do you mean

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

was it worth it

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i want to do that too

have you read

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i understand

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i dont understand magnetisation

abrar?

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

as in

so an active mazelike process

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

send your tumblr