with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
i want to do that too
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
so at the end
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
all that is to say
thank you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
you cannot feed someone truth
plato
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
ahnaf abrar
"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"
and the fake qualifier
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.bro i read nothing in my life
I am below everything.
sorry i am texting like a slav
have you read
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
but really the thing should be autonomous
i see a website
magnetises a pin