it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
Can I see
its good short few pages
and the fake qualifier
no like which do people call me
much more tactility
all that is to say
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like first name
what do you think my name is
division of reality is straying away from it
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i want to do that too
as in
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
its good
send link
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
whats your name?
we can only engage in such a way
wait what is that
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation