much more tactility
sorry i am texting like a slav
what do you mean
thank you
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
is this you as well
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
we need to be deconstructing our identities
lol
so at the end
ahnaf abrar
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
god being the centre magnet
feel you
plato
send your tumblr
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
fw
i really havent
isaac newton
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
division of reality is straying away from it
December 2025