ion

so the method has to be autonomous

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone truth

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

yes

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so an active mazelike process

as in

i dont understand magnetisation

sorry i am texting like a slav

all that is to say

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

god being the centre magnet

yeah

2 (actually index). two is company
        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

its good

was it worth it

and so on. not wanting the rhyming / clanging