propensity within someone

not their contents

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

much more tactility

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its performative

i have read not even 1 book

we can only engage in such a way

autonomy of learning

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

isaac

god being the centre magnet

which magnetises chains of pins

i understand

division of reality is straying away from it

so an active mazelike process

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

barren land

i dont understand magnetisation

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

abrar?

plato

magnetisation/form

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

like magnets

i want to do that too

so the method has to be autonomous

send your tumblr