and the fake qualifier
plato
was it worth it
we can only engage in such a way
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
autonomy of learning
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i understand
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
not their contents
fw
magnetises a pin
its performative
propensity within someone
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
abrar?
idk
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
isaac newton
no i haven't really read anything
thank you
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
no like which do people call me
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me