really i want the internet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so the method has to be autonomous

have you read

your feed looks like my tumblr

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

plato

isaac newton

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

we can only engage in such a way

i have read not even 1 book

which magnetises chains of pins

magnetisation/form

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

like magnets

its good short few pages

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

isaac

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

Slug

December 2025

feel you

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation