And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

was it worth it

i really havent

not so on: yvf(wthw)

bro i read nothing in my life

i dont understand magnetisation

sorry i am texting like a slav

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

lol

plato

It Will Get Lighter

i have read not even 1 book

fw

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

this will be about a slug

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

...

We stand there laughing. The fireworks go off behind him.

...

i was tempted to lie about my name

Thank you, Jack

I am below everything.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.