there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
your feed looks like my tumblr
magnetises a pin
i understand
no i haven't really read anything
send your tumblr
propensity within someone
whats your name?
isaac newton
its good
as in
i really havent
have you read
what do you mean
its good short few pages
and the fake qualifier
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
like first name
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
like magnets
send link
you cannot feed someone truth
wait what is that
bro i read nothing in my life
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
or never left
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?