we can only engage in such a way

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

and the fake qualifier

yeah

so the method has to be autonomous

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

autonomy of learning

i understand

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i love it here

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

plato

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you think my name is

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

division of reality is straying away from it

was it worth it

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

bro i read nothing in my life

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

have you read

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

Can I see

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

you have a beautiful account btw