your feed looks like my tumblr

all that is to say

i dont understand magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

feel you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

abrar?

so an active mazelike process

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

isaac

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

what do you mean

we can only engage in such a way

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

Today I felt like starting

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

idk

and the fake qualifier

Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

which magnetises chains of pins

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book