my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we can only engage in such a way
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so the method has to be autonomous
as in
magnetisation/form
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
lol yea
much more tactility
is everyoneback on tumblr now
the site i am dreaming
bro i read nothing in my life
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
your feed looks like my tumblr
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then